Results: Search for UK Energy Market

The BMRS website provides near real time and historic data about the Balancing Mechanism which is used by the National Grid (System Operator) as a means of balancing power flows on to and off the electricity Transmission System in Great Britain. Data is added on a near real-time basis

TESBiC: Techno-Economic Study of Biomass to power with CCS. This model was developed as part of Work Package 3. It examines changes in cost, efficiency and emissions under different operating conditions for biodedicated IGCC with CCS. It should be read in conjunction with the Work Package 3 reports on model specification and user documentation. The Biomass to Power with CCS Phase 1 project consisted of four work packages: WP1: Landscape review of current developments; WP2: High Level Engineering Study (down-selecting from 24 to 8 Biomass to Power with CCS technologies); WP3: Parameterised Sub-System Models development; and WP4: Technology benchmarking and recommendation report. Reports generally follow this coding. We would suggest that you do not read any of the earlier deliverables in isolation as some assumptions in the reports were shown to be invalid. We would recommend that you read the project executive summaries as they provide a good summary of the overall conclusions. This work demonstrated the potential value of Biomass to Power with CCS technologies as a family, but it was clear at the time of the project, that the individual technologies were insufficiently mature to be able to 'pick a winner', due to the uncertainties around cost and performance associated with lower Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs).

Elexon data from the Balancing and Settlement Code (BCS) systems that are available include: Balancing Mechanism Reporting Service (BMRS) data; the Elexon Portal and operational reports. If you're a company who isnt a BSC Party but would like to receive specific BSC data, there are contact details to request standard packages of reports that are available to non-Parties on request, subject to set licensing arrangements and fees.

Central Data Collection Agent (CDCA) data : Inter Grid Supply Point Group Connection Period Data (IPD); Grid Supply Point Period Data (GP9); Aggregated Grid Supply Point Group Take Volumes (AGV); Balancing Mechanism Unit Aggregation Report (ABV). Settlement Administration Agent (SAA) data: Aggregate Party Day Charges (APC); Market Index Day Period Information (MD1); Settlement Period Information (SPI); Settlement Period Information (SSD); Trading Unit Period Information (TRA). Data descriptions are also available on this web page.

Refining Estimates of Land for Biomass (RELB) was a project commissioned and funded by the ETI. As part of the RELB project, the ETI commissioned the project team to complete three case studies of farms growing bioenergy crops. This workbook consists of the data and calculations for the Abbey Farm Miscanthus case study and should be read alongside the other case studies and the rest of the RELB documentation.

Refining Estimates of Land for Biomass (RELB) was a project commissioned and funded by the ETI. As part of the RELB project, the ETI commissioned the project team to complete three case studies of farms growing bioenergy crops. This workbook consists of the data and calculations for the Friars Farm Miscanthus case study and should be read alongside the other case studies and the rest of the RELB documentation.

Refining Estimates of Land for Biomass (RELB) was a project commissioned and funded by the ETI. As part of the RELB project, the ETI commissioned the project team to complete three case studies of farms growing bioenergy crops. This workbook covers the data and calculations for the Brackenthwaite Farm SRC Willow case study

Refining Estimates of Land for Biomass (RELB) was a project commissioned and funded by the ETI. This workbook includes the data for the charts displayed in Appendix 1 of the report, Job implications of establishing a bioenergy market.

Refining Estimates of Land for Biomass (RELB) was a project commissioned and funded by the ETI. This workbook includes the data for the charts displayed in the main body of the report, Job implications of establishing a bioenergy market.

The data collection form used during the field survey

Results from the field survey carried out to validate the provisional constraint mask developed during the desk study

This spreadsheet provides a detailed Level 2 Cost Estimate for the Minimum Viable Development of Captain Subsea Option - MVD (No Goldeneye) for CO2 CCS Storage in the Central North Sea.

This spreadsheet provides the underlying breakdown of the capital cost estimate for the NE England location. Note that minor changes have been made to numbers in the spreadsheet to protect commercially sensitive cost data that was used in calculating the operating cost in D5.1. Hence the total numbers in the spreadsheet may differ slightly from those presented in D5.1.

This spreadsheet provides a detailed Level 2 Cost Estimate for the Minimum Viable Development of CCS Storage in the Ormskirk Sandstone in the faulted horst block known as Hamilton (UKCS block 110/13) in the East Irish Sea.

This spreadsheet provides a detailed Level 2 Cost Estimate for CCS Storage in Site 2: Forties 5 - South Site

This spreadsheet provides a detailed Level 2 Cost Estimate for the Minimum Viable Development of Site 7: Bunter Closure 36 for CCS Storage.

This spreadsheet provides a detailed Level 2 Cost Estimate for the Minimum Viable Development of Site 7: Bunter Closure 36 for CCS Storage.

This project, funded with up to £2.5m from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC - now the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy), was led by Aberdeen-based consultancy Pale Blue Dot Energy supported by Axis Well Technology and Costain. The project appraised five selected CO2 storage sites towards readiness for Final Investment Decisions. The sites were selected from a short-list of 20 (drawn from a long-list of 579 potential sites), representing the tip of a very large strategic national CO2 storage resource potential (estimated as 78,000 million tonnes). The sites were selected based on their potential to mobilise commercial-scale carbon, capture and storage projects for the UK. Outline development plans and budgets were prepared, confirming no major technical hurdles to storing industrial scale CO2 offshore in theUK with sites able to service both mainland Europe and the UK. The project built on data from CO2stored - the UK's CO2 storage atlas - a database which was created from the ETI's UK Storage Appraisal Project. This is now publically available and being further developed by The Crown Estate and the British Geological Survey. Information on CO2Stored is available atwww.co2stored.com. This spreadsheet is the appraisal model of Site 14: Captain Aquifer

This project, funded with up to £2.5m from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC - now the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy), was led by Aberdeen-based consultancy Pale Blue Dot Energy supported by Axis Well Technology and Costain. The project appraised five selected CO2 storage sites towards readiness for Final Investment Decisions. The sites were selected from a short-list of 20 (drawn from a long-list of 579 potential sites), representing the tip of a very large strategic national CO2 storage resource potential (estimated as 78,000 million tonnes). The sites were selected based on their potential to mobilise commercial-scale carbon, capture and storage projects for the UK. Outline development plans and budgets were prepared, confirming no major technical hurdles to storing industrial scale CO2 offshore in theUK with sites able to service both mainland Europe and the UK. The project built on data from CO2stored - the UK's CO2 storage atlas - a database which was created from the ETI's UK Storage Appraisal Project. This is now publically available and being further developed by The Crown Estate and the British Geological Survey. Information on CO2Stored is available atwww.co2stored.com. This spreadsheet is the appraisal model of Site 19: Hamilton

This project, funded with up to £2.5m from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC - now the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy), was led by Aberdeen-based consultancy Pale Blue Dot Energy supported by Axis Well Technology and Costain. The project appraised five selected CO2 storage sites towards readiness for Final Investment Decisions. The sites were selected from a short-list of 20 (drawn from a long-list of 579 potential sites), representing the tip of a very large strategic national CO2 storage resource potential (estimated as 78,000 million tonnes). The sites were selected based on their potential to mobilise commercial-scale carbon, capture and storage projects for the UK. Outline development plans and budgets were prepared, confirming no major technical hurdles to storing industrial scale CO2 offshore in theUK with sites able to service both mainland Europe and the UK. The project built on data from CO2stored - the UK's CO2 storage atlas - a database which was created from the ETI's UK Storage Appraisal Project. This is now publically available and being further developed by The Crown Estate and the British Geological Survey. Information on CO2Stored is available atwww.co2stored.com. This spreadsheet is the appraisal model of Site 2: Forties 5 (North And South Combined)

This project, funded with up to £2.5m from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC - now the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy), was led by Aberdeen-based consultancy Pale Blue Dot Energy supported by Axis Well Technology and Costain. The project appraised five selected CO2 storage sites towards readiness for Final Investment Decisions. The sites were selected from a short-list of 20 (drawn from a long-list of 579 potential sites), representing the tip of a very large strategic national CO2 storage resource potential (estimated as 78,000 million tonnes). The sites were selected based on their potential to mobilise commercial-scale carbon, capture and storage projects for the UK. Outline development plans and budgets were prepared, confirming no major technical hurdles to storing industrial scale CO2 offshore in theUK with sites able to service both mainland Europe and the UK. The project built on data from CO2stored - the UK's CO2 storage atlas - a database which was created from the ETI's UK Storage Appraisal Project. This is now publically available and being further developed by The Crown Estate and the British Geological Survey. Information on CO2Stored is available atwww.co2stored.com. This spreadsheet is the appraisal model of Site 5: Viking

This project, funded with up to £2.5m from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC - now the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy), was led by Aberdeen-based consultancy Pale Blue Dot Energy supported by Axis Well Technology and Costain. The project appraised five selected CO2 storage sites towards readiness for Final Investment Decisions. The sites were selected from a short-list of 20 (drawn from a long-list of 579 potential sites), representing the tip of a very large strategic national CO2 storage resource potential (estimated as 78,000 million tonnes). The sites were selected based on their potential to mobilise commercial-scale carbon, capture and storage projects for the UK. Outline development plans and budgets were prepared, confirming no major technical hurdles to storing industrial scale CO2 offshore in theUK with sites able to service both mainland Europe and the UK. The project built on data from CO2stored - the UK's CO2 storage atlas - a database which was created from the ETI's UK Storage Appraisal Project. This is now publically available and being further developed by The Crown Estate and the British Geological Survey. Information on CO2Stored is available at www.co2stored.com. This spreadsheet is the appraisal model of Site 7: Bunter Closure 36.

This spreadsheet provides the underlying breakdown of the capital cost estimate for the the Teeside location. Note that minor changes have been made to numbers in the spreadsheet to protect commercially sensitive cost data that was used in calculating the capital cost in the main report, amd hence the total numbers in the spreadsheet may differ slightly from those presented there.

This tool presents the costs to consumers of support to different electricity generation technologies. It is designed to help show the impact of different policy / market arrangements on the required support for different generation technologies. Users can also examine the effect of amending some inputs (although due to the interdependency of the system, sensitivities such as changing variable costs will require a re-run of the underlying dispatch/investment model.

This toolkit presents the whole-system impacts of electricity generation technologies. It is designed to help show the underlying assumptions driving differences in the whole system impact calculated from a dispatch and investment model. Users can examine the effect of amending some inputs on the whole system impact (although due to interdependency of the system, sensitivities such as changing variable costs will be a re-run of the underlying dispatch/investment model). The toolkit is set up to easily accept input from EnVision/DDM, but could (with appropriate transformation of outputs) be used with another dispatch and investment model.

This spreadsheet provides the underlying breakdown of the capital cost estimate for the NE England location. Note that minor changes have been made to numbers in the spreadsheet to protect commercially sensitive cost data that was used in calculating the operating cost in D5.1. Hence the total numbers in the spreadsheet may differ slightly from those presented in D5.1.